![]() They either make do with what's in the new Pro - or find an alternative. Turning to a different comparison, the new Apple M2 Ultra's 220,000 Geekbench 6 Compute scores (Metal) sit between the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (208,340 OpenCL) and RTX 4080 (245,706 OpenCL). I'm pretty sure they bought plenty of external graphics cards to go into their Pros. The first Geekbench 6 benchmark result for the new Mac Pro surfaced today, providing a closer look at the M2 Ultra chip's CPU performance in the. Those folks, I imagine, don't care too much about the base price of the Mac Pros they buy - they care they can get ever more photorealistic CGI done quickly. In general, I think I agree with analysts/posters who think Apple lost sight of who the prime users for their Mac Pro are: video/CGI folks who use the Mac to make movies, ads, etc. And whether they're typically done on a desk-side machine vs. The MacBook Pro (13-inch Mid 2018) with an Intel Core i5-8259U processor scores 1,110 for single-core performance and 3,963 for multi-core performance in the. Razer Blade (15-inch, 2018) 235.5 Apple MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2018) 44.3 Apple MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017) 40. Not saying they don't exist - I'm just interested in what they are. Saturday J10:45 am PDT by Joe Rossignol The first benchmark results for Apple's new M2 Ultra chip have surfaced on Geekbench 6, providing a closer look at CPU performance. Based on past experience I would expect the 2023 to crash once the memory usage gets close to the max.Ĭount me naive, but I'd love to know what single simulation requires an in-memory dataset that large. In single-core, the 2018 Mac mini benchmarks beat every current generation. I would like to see a comparison where someone performs the same physics 3D simulation with a dataset larger than 192GB with a maxed out 2023 Mac Pro vs a maxed out 2019. As for the results, 2018 Mac mini benchmarks show a single-core score of 5512 and a multicore score of 23516.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |